This comparison isn't really about who has the bigger number β it's about which chain you want to trade on. Solana Funded is the biggest Solana-native prop firm: fast, cheap settlement and an up-to-88% split, built for traders who live in the Solana ecosystem. Propr.xyz β the firm I run my own challenges and my own bot on β is built on Hyperliquid, the deepest on-chain perps venue, and pays a flat 80%. Both are on-chain, both pay in stablecoins, and the right answer depends almost entirely on where your edge actually is.
The short answer
You live in the Solana ecosystem and trade its pairs? Solana Funded is the natural pick β native settlement, rock-bottom network fees, and the highest split of the two at up to 88%. You want Hyperliquid's market depth on majors, a fully documented rulebook, and the right to run a bot? Propr. Solana Funded wins on chain-fit and headline split; Propr wins on liquidity depth, documentation and automation. I trade systematically with a bot, so I need depth and an API β that's Propr.
Two on-chain firms, two ecosystems
Solana Funded bet on Solana, and for the right trader that bet pays off. Settlement is Solana-native, so network fees are tiny and confirmation is fast β if your strategy turns over a lot of small payouts, that friction reduction is real money. The split tops out at up to 88%, above Propr's 80%, and accounts run to $250K. The trade-off is depth and documentation: liquidity on Solana varies more by pair than Hyperliquid's perps book, and the firm publishes less about its exact drawdown mechanics and automation policy than Propr does. My full Solana Funded review covers what's documented and what isn't.
Propr.xyz bet on Hyperliquid β the venue with the deepest on-chain perps liquidity in 2026. It's a SwissBorg-backed firm with five account sizes (5K / 10K / 25K / 50K / 100K), published fees ($60β$999 for 1-Step, $50β$749 for 2-Step), and a rulebook (v1.0.2) that spells out every limit: 1-Step with a 10% target, 3% fixed daily loss and 6% static drawdown; 2-Step with 5% then 10% targets, 5% fixed daily loss and 8% trailing drawdown. Payouts are USDC on-chain β $50 minimum, processed within 24 hours, about 5 hours on average per the public transparency page. Bots and copy trading are explicitly allowed, the REST API with Python/JS SDKs is official, KYC kicks in only at funded, and the funded cap is $200K. Leverage is 5x on BTC/ETH, 2x on other cryptos.
Head to head: the numbers
- Chain: Solana Funded β Solana-native Β· Propr β Hyperliquid.
- Profit split: Solana Funded β up to 88% (conditions to verify) Β· Propr β flat 80% from the first payout.
- Max account: Solana Funded β $250K Β· Propr β $100K challenges, $200K funded cap.
- Market depth: Solana Funded β Solana liquidity, varies by pair Β· Propr β Hyperliquid perps depth on majors.
- Settlement: both on-chain β Solana wins on raw network fees, Propr publishes a payout track record (~5h average).
- Rules transparency: Propr β full public rulebook v1.0.2 Β· Solana Funded β thinner public documentation; verify before paying.
- Automation: Propr β public REST API, Python/JS SDKs, bots and copy trading explicitly allowed Β· Solana Funded β less documented automation/API story.
- Backing: Propr β SwissBorg-backed, public transparency page Β· Solana Funded β biggest Solana-native option, shorter public track record.
What Solana Funded genuinely gets right
An honest comparison gives the Solana firm its due, and it earns three real points. First, native settlement: if you already operate inside Solana, you skip bridging entirely and pay near-zero network fees β the cleanest UX in the category for a Solana trader. Second, the split: up to 88% is a genuine edge over Propr's 80%, provided you confirm the unlock conditions. Third, ecosystem fit: for Solana-native pairs and memecoin-style flow, being on the same chain as your edge removes friction Propr can't match. If verifiable on-chain settlement is what drew you to this category, both firms qualify β I rank the field in my decentralized prop firm guide.
The caveats mirror the strengths. The 88% is an up to β confirm what you start at. Depth on Solana is pair-dependent, so size your fills carefully on thinner markets. And the documentation gap is the same one I flag everywhere: when the exact drawdown mechanics and automation policy aren't in a published rulebook, I can't fully model my breach risk β and modeling breach risk is most of what passing a challenge is.
Where Propr wins: depth, docs, and a bot you can trust
Two things decide it for how I trade. First, market depth: Hyperliquid's perps book lets a systematic strategy scale in and out on majors without slippage eating the edge β that matters more to a bot than eight points of split. Second, automation: Propr's rulebook explicitly allows bots and copy trading, and its public API with official SDKs is documented infrastructure. That's what lets Bubbles run a disciplined DCA strategy with hard guardrails on my accounts β non-custodial, inside the rules, with the 3% daily-loss math enforced by code instead of willpower. Solana Funded has no equivalent public automation story today.
On-chain settlement and documented rules close it out. Propr publishes its payout numbers and spells out every drawdown limit β including the difference between the 1-Step's 6% static drawdown (never moves up behind you) and the 2-Step's 8% trailing one (can breach an account that's still net-positive). I broke all of it down in the Propr rules guide, and the format math in my 1-Step vs 2-Step breakdown.
The verdict
Pick Solana Funded if you're a Solana-ecosystem trader who wants the highest split of the two, native settlement and the lowest network fees on that chain. For Solana-native and memecoin flow, it's the better-fit firm β just verify the unlock conditions and size carefully on thinner pairs.
Pick Propr if you want Hyperliquid's market depth, a fully documented rulebook, published payout speed and the right to automate. It's the firm I run my own money and my own bot on, and my overall #1 in the best decentralized prop firms ranking. You can create your Propr.xyz account here β through that link you get 5% USDC cashback on your challenge fee, which takes a $50 2-Step down to $47.50 net.
FAQ β Propr vs Solana Funded
What's the main difference between Propr and Solana Funded?+
The chain they live on. Propr.xyz settles on Hyperliquid, the deepest on-chain perps venue, with a documented rulebook and a public API. Solana Funded is the biggest Solana-native prop firm β fast, cheap settlement inside the Solana ecosystem, with a higher headline split (up to 88%). Your pick mostly depends on which ecosystem and which market depth you want to trade.
Is Solana Funded's 88% split better than Propr's 80%?+
On paper, yes β 88% beats 80%. But the 88% is an 'up to' figure, and a split only pays out if you pass the challenge and the market is deep enough to fill your size cleanly. On Hyperliquid, Propr gives you more liquidity on majors; on Solana, depth varies more by pair. Eight points of split matter less than reliable fills and a rulebook you can model.
Which has faster, cheaper payouts?+
Both settle on-chain in stablecoins. Solana's selling point is genuinely fast, low-fee settlement β that's the whole reason to be Solana-native. Propr pays USDC on Hyperliquid, $50 minimum, within 24 hours and about 5 hours on average per its public transparency page. Both are quick; Solana wins on raw network fees, Propr wins on a published track record.
Can I run a trading bot on Solana Funded?+
Propr documents it; Solana Funded doesn't, as clearly. Propr's rulebook explicitly allows bots and copy trading, and its public REST API with Python/JS SDKs is official infrastructure β that's what Bubbles runs on. Solana Funded publishes less about its automation policy and API, so verify before you build anything on it.
Which is better for memecoin or Solana-ecosystem trading?+
Solana Funded, naturally. If your edge is in Solana-native pairs and you live in that ecosystem, a Solana-native firm removes bridging friction and keeps fees low. Propr is built for Hyperliquid's perps depth on majors and a wider altcoin set at 2x. Match the firm to where you actually trade.
Which should I pick in 2026?+
Pick Solana Funded if you're a Solana-ecosystem trader who wants the highest split and the cheapest settlement on that chain. Pick Propr if you want Hyperliquid's market depth, a fully documented rulebook, published payout speed and the right to automate with a bot or copy trading. For my own systematic, bot-driven style, that's Propr.
Trade the deepest one β on autopilot.
Bubbles runs a DCA bot with hard guardrails on your own Propr account through the official API β non-custodial, set up from Telegram in 3 minutes.
Launch BubblesNot on Propr yet? Create your Propr.xyz account with 5% USDC cashback on your challenge fee.
β οΈ Trading carries risk. Propr figures come from the official rulebook (v1.0.2, April 2026); Solana Funded figures are its advertised headline terms as of June 2026 β the 88% split is an "up to" and conditions must be verified on its site before paying any fee. This article is informational, contains affiliate links, and is not investment advice. Only trade what you can afford to lose.