Skip to content

Pass your prop firm challenge on semi-auto with Bubbles.

Join Propr

Methodology · Trust Score

On-chain prop firms, scored out of 100

Saying “our number one is X” is worthless without a grid. Here is ours: five weighted criteria, every sub-score published, so you can recompute the total and tell us where we're wrong. It is deliberately built around one question — will this firm actually pay you? — rather than around the biggest number on its landing page.

The grid

  • Rules & transparency25%
  • Payouts & verifiability25%
  • Survival & track record20%
  • Trading freedom15%
  • Cost & value15%
#FirmScore
1Propr.xyztraded88.9/100
2Hypernovadesk77.6/100
3Carrot Fundingdesk72.9/100
4Solana Fundeddesk69.8/100
5Breakoutdesk69.5/100
6HyperPNLdesk62.3/100
7GT Fundeddesk18.3/100

Weights: Rules & transparency 25% · Payouts & verifiability 25% · Survival & track record 20% · Trading freedom 15% · Cost & value 15%. Firms we have not traded are capped at 85/100. Last review: 25 July 2026.

#1Propr.xyz88.9/100Excellent

The most complete published rulebook in the category (v1.0.3, versioned with a changelog), on-chain USDC payouts you can verify, and no consistency rule, time limit or bot ban. Loses points on survival — it is barely a year old — and on value, where an 80% split is beaten on paper by several competitors.

#2Hypernova77.6/100Good

Up to 90% split with instant smart-contract payouts, which is genuinely better than Propr on the money side. Documentation is thinner and we have not run a paid evaluation, so this score is desk research only.

#3Carrot Funding72.9/100Good

Publishes payout transaction hashes, which few firms do, and offers large account sizes on Arbitrum. Rulebook is less detailed than Propr's and we have not traded it.

#4Solana Funded69.8/100Fair

Up to 88% and Solana-native, which suits memecoin traders specifically. Documentation is average for the category and the track record is short.

#5Breakout69.5/100Fair

Kraken ownership makes it the safest bet on survival by a wide margin. But settlement is off-chain on a centralised terminal, which costs it heavily on verifiability — the whole reason to pick an on-chain firm.

#6HyperPNL62.3/100Fair

An LP-funded model with a public Dune dashboard — transparent in an unusual way. But a ~75% split is the lowest here and the firm is still early.

#7GT Funded18.3/100Avoid

The cautionary tale of the category. Advertised the best headline numbers (up to 92%, $300K), then went completely dark in June 2026 with no statement and nothing for its funded traders. The July relaunch on a new domain is a waitlist page whose own figures contradict each other. Scores near zero on the criteria that matter.

Why the grid is weighted this way

Half the score sits on rules and payouts, and that is not an accident. Every prop firm failure I have watched came down to one of two things: a rule the trader could not have computed before paying, or a payout that never arrived. Nothing else matters if those two go wrong.

Survival carries 20% because this industry buries its firms fast — roughly a quarter of tracked prop firms are already inactive, and the crypto category is the youngest of the lot. A firm that has gone dark once starts from near zero here, even if it reappears. GT Funded.

Value gets only 15%, and that is the most counter-intuitive choice on this page. The advertised profit split is the number every firm competes on and the one that predicts your outcome least well. An 80% split you actually reach beats a 92% split from a firm that disappears.

What we don't do

Scores, ranking positions and reviews are not for sale, and no payment makes a review happen faster. Some links on this site are affiliate links, labelled as such — the grid is published precisely so a biased ranking would be obvious. If a score doesn't match the criteria, tell us and we'll correct it publicly, with a date. contact page.

Firms we haven't traded are capped at 85/100 and marked “desk”. Reading documentation is not the same as putting money on a challenge and asking for a payout, and the score should say so.

FAQ

How is the Trust Score calculated?+

Five weighted criteria out of 100: rules and transparency (25%), payouts and verifiability (25%), survival and track record (20%), trading freedom (15%), cost and value (15%). Every sub-score is published on this page, so you can recompute the total yourself and disagree with it.

Why doesn't the firm with the highest profit split win?+

Because the advertised split is the least reliable number in this industry. GT Funded advertised up to 92% on $300K accounts — the best headline figures in the category — then went dark in June 2026 with nothing for its funded traders.

What does 'traded' vs 'desk' mean?+

'Traded' means we bought an evaluation and ran it with our own money. 'Desk' means the score comes from public documentation only — those firms are capped at 85/100.

Do affiliate commissions affect the ranking?+

No. Some links are affiliate links and they're labelled. The grid is published precisely so that a biased ranking would be visible: if a score doesn't match the criteria, you can point it out and we'll correct it publicly.

Last full review: 25 July 2026. status census · testing methodology

Newsletter

Join our VIP

Best prop-firm bonuses, airdrop alerts and new firm reviews — straight to your inbox. No spam.

We only use your email for VIP updates. Unsubscribe anytime.