Reserves · read on-chain
Decentralized prop firms ranked by on-chain reserves (2026)
A ranking with one rule: the reserve must be readable by anyone, at a public address, today. Most of the table is empty. That emptiness is the finding.
Latest reserve reading 6 October 2026 · firm census re-checked continuously · tier scale here
The answer, in three sentences
Of the 10 crypto and on-chain prop firms we track, 2publish a payout reserve at scale that anyone can read on the blockchain: Hypernova, $360,302.43, read by us on Arbitrum on 6 October 2026 at a public address, and Propr, $1,025,662.96 USDC across three public wallets, read by us on 4 October 2026 at 02:43 UTC — published since 3 October 2026, with about half of it Hyperliquid margin. Carrot Funding publishes a named address table in its GitBook, and we read its Vault Custody Safe on HyperEVM at about $15,016 on 10 September 2026 — a partial picture, since the firm states its funds are mid-migration from Arbitrum, and a correction of ours: we had wrongly written that it could not be located. Propr’s payouts are also verifiable by hash — we verified a real payout of 119.79 USDC received in our own wallet on 31 July 2026. The other 7 firms expose nothing verifiable at all.
The ranking
“Readable reserve” means a published address whose balance a stranger can check in a block explorer without asking anyone’s permission. A dashboard screenshot is not a reserve. A tx hash is proof of a past payout, not of tomorrow’s solvency.
← scroll →
| # | Firm | Readable on-chain reserve | Last dated reading | Address / proof | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Propr | $1,025,662.96 USDC across three public wallets | 4 October 2026 | 0xeaf6…8c3f ↗ | Since 3 October 2026 Propr publishes a Proof of Reserve (cold and hot reserve on Ethereum, margin on Hyperliquid); we read the wallets ourselves on 4 October 2026 at 02:43 UTC: $1,025,662.96 USDC of stablecoin, plus $76,715.38 of perps account value under open hedges. A first reading, taken a day after the cold reserve was funded, on plain wallets, with about half of it hedging margin. Every payout is also verifiable by tx hash, and one landed in our own wallet: 119.79 USDC on 31 July 2026. |
| 2 | Hypernova | $360,302.43 | 6 October 2026 | 0x43c5…da07 ↗ | A payout reserve readable at two published Arbitrum addresses (vault + reserve wallet), in the vault its payouts draw from, since August 2026. A moving number — which is exactly what a real reserve does. |
| — | Carrot Funding | ~$15,016 in the Vault Custody Safe (HyperEVM) + $98 on HyperCore | 6 October 2026 | — | Correction of ours, published 10 September 2026: this row briefly read "promised, not locatable". It was wrong. Carrot's GitBook publishes a full address table with named roles — Vault Custody Contract, Vault Integrations, a 2-of-4 payout multisig and the payout executor EOA — and we had not read that page. Having read it we checked it the same day: the Vault Custody Contract on HyperEVM is a Safe holding about $15,016 in the Felix/Morpho USDC vault, plus $98 on HyperCore. Read it as one contract on one chain on one day, not as a firm total: Carrot states its funds are mid-migration from Arbitrum to HyperEVM, so the on-chain picture is partial. Also verifiable: the four payout hashes the firm publishes are real USDC transfers on Arbitrum (733.22 · 384.38 · 399.24 · 799.41), checked one by one. Publishing which address does what, by name, is a strength — not every firm in this table does it. |
| — | Solana Funded | None published | 6 October 2026 | — | On-chain payouts on Solana advertised; no verifiable reserve address published. |
| — | HyperPNL | None published | 6 October 2026 | — | Its docs name a Payout Treasury and promise a payout reserve that is public on-chain — but no contract address is published on the site, in the GitBook, in the Terms of Use or in the app's JavaScript bundle. No longer a documentary hypothesis: we bought a $42 evaluation and traced it end to end on Arbitrum, and the only on-chain event was a deposit into a third-party bridging contract before the fee was debited off-chain. Nothing to read, because nothing tells you where to look. |
| — | PropMarket | None published | 6 October 2026 | — | No verifiable on-chain reserve published. |
| — | PolyFunded | None published | 6 October 2026 | — | On-chain USDC payouts advertised; no reserve address published. |
| — | Breakout | None published | 6 October 2026 | — | Kraken-owned, settles on a centralised terminal — there is nothing on-chain to read. |
| — | FundedPoly | None published | 6 October 2026 | — | Site suspended (HTTP 402 at last check) — at risk. A reserve would matter most exactly here; there is none. |
| — | GT Funded | None — went dark June 2026 | 6 October 2026 | — | Original domain gone since June 2026; a waitlist landing page now runs on a new domain. Nothing verifiable. |
Hypernova: read on Arbitrum on 6 October 2026 (vault + reserve wallet). Propr: stablecoin across three wallets, read on 4 October 2026 at 02:43 UTC. Firm statuses from our DNS/HTTP census, each row dated with its own last check. Reserves are live numbers — always trust the dated reading, never a headline.
Why this ranking is almost empty
A readable reserve is a precise thing: a blockchain address the firm publishes, holding the money it intends to pay traders with, whose balance anyone — you, a rival, a journalist — can check in ten seconds on a block explorer. Not a “total paid out” counter on a homepage, which is a claim. Not a payout tx hash, which proves the past. A balance, at an address, now.
That makes it the only solvency signal in this industry that does not require trusting the firm. Every other assurance — dashboards, testimonials, Discord screenshots — is produced by the party being assessed. A published reserve address is the one claim a firm cannot fake and cannot quietly retract: once public, everyone can watch the balance, including on the day it drains. Which is precisely why 7 of the 10 firms we track have published none at all, and why the 2 that publish one at scale head the table.
HyperPNL is the sharpest illustration, because we stopped reading and paid. On 9 September 2026 we bought a 1-Step Flex $5,000 evaluation there for $42, funded it in USDC on Arbitrum and traded it the same day. The only on-chain event that purchase produced is a deposit into RelayDepository, the deposit contract of the third-party bridging protocol Relay; the fee was then debited off-chain, in the firm’s internal ledger. No Payment Router transaction, no allocation to a Payout Treasury, no revenue split — and still no address for any of the three contracts its docs name. We are not saying those contracts do not exist. We are saying that for the part of the chain we control there is nothing to verify, while its homepage sells “Everyone can see everything on-chain”. Say what that is and what it is not: it is a disclosure gap, and we score it under rules. What we traced is our purchase, not a withdrawal — we have never requested a payout from HyperPNL, so its payout criterion has nothing new to price and did not move. The contrast with the two firms above is still the point of this page, stated honestly: at Hypernova and at Propr we have been paid and have reconciled the money on-chain — Hypernova’s payout reserve and its 80% split to the cent on Arbitrum, and Propr’s Payout Distributor a verified contract on Ethereum with published source code. At HyperPNL there is no reserve address to read, and no withdrawal of ours to compare.
The invitation stands: any firm that publishes a payout reserve address gets read, dated and ranked here, with a link to the explorer. That costs nothing but courage. Talk to us — or just publish the address and we will find it.
How we read a reserve
We take the firm’s published address, query the USDC balance ourselves via a public RPC or block explorer, and record the figure with the date of the reading. No firm-supplied screenshots, no third-party aggregators. Readings are refreshed on a weekly cadence (our freshness task) and after any relevant event; a stale figure is never left undated. The full method — including how we verify payouts, rules and firm status — is in how we test prop firms.
This page is the reserve ranking only. For the broader question — how verifiable each firm is end to end, contracts included — see the on-chain tier scale, where the same firms are graded on five levels of verifiability. To weigh fees, splits and rules side by side, use the comparator; to see what happens to firms without reserves, visit the prop firm graveyard.
FAQ
Which prop firm has the largest verifiable on-chain reserve?+
Propr has the larger readable figure on our latest reads: Propr $1,025,662.96 USDC across three public wallets (read 4 October 2026 at 02:43 UTC), Hypernova $360,302.43 in USDC on Arbitrum (read 6 October 2026). They differ in kind: Hypernova's sits in one vault its payouts draw from and has been readable since August 2026; Propr's is a first reading on plain wallets, with about half of it Hyperliquid margin for open hedges. Neither is the only readable one, and that is partly a correction of ours from 10 September 2026: Carrot Funding publishes a named address table in its GitBook, and its Vault Custody Contract on HyperEVM is a Safe we read at about $15,016 in the Felix/Morpho USDC vault plus $98 on HyperCore, with funds stated to be mid-migration from Arbitrum — a partial picture, but a readable one, and we had wrongly written that it could not be located. Of the 10 firms we track, the rest publish nothing verifiable at all.
Can I verify a prop firm's reserve myself?+
Yes, if the firm publishes the address — that is the entire point of an on-chain reserve. Paste it into a block explorer like Arbiscan and read the USDC balance; no account, no permission, no trust required. Hypernova's reserve wallet is 0x43c5f0a81d538a527dbf35d27faa583ac7fada07 on Arbitrum. If a firm claims a reserve but won't give you an address, treat the claim as marketing.
Does Propr publish an on-chain reserve?+
Yes, since 3 October 2026. Since 3 October 2026 Propr publishes a Proof of Reserve across three public wallets (cold and hot reserve on Ethereum, margin on Hyperliquid); we read them ourselves on 4 October 2026 at 02:43 UTC: $1,025,662.96 USDC of stablecoin, plus $76,715.38 of perps account value under open hedges. It is a balance read at one moment, on plain externally-owned wallets, with about half of it Hyperliquid margin that moves with open hedges — a snapshot, not a guarantee. Propr also publishes its payout addresses on Ethereum, so every payout is verifiable by transaction hash: we verified one first-hand, 119.79 USDC received in our own wallet on 31 July 2026.
Can I read HyperPNL's payout reserve on-chain?+
No — and since 9 September 2026 that is a first-hand finding rather than a documentary one. HyperPNL's docs promise a payout reserve that is public on-chain and name three contracts — Payment Router, Payout Treasury, Data Recorder — but not one address is published anywhere: not on the site, not in the GitBook, not in the Terms of Use readable once logged in, not in the app's JavaScript bundle. On 9 September 2026 we bought a 1-Step Flex $5,000 evaluation there for $42, funded it in USDC on Arbitrum, traded it the same day, and traced the payment end to end from a public RPC. The only on-chain event is a deposit into RelayDepository, the deposit contract of the third-party bridging protocol Relay; the $42 was then debited off-chain in HyperPNL's internal ledger, with no Payment Router transaction, no allocation to a Payout Treasury, no revenue split and no referral commission. We are not saying those contracts do not exist; we are saying that for the part of the chain we control there is nothing to verify, while the homepage sells "Everyone can see everything on-chain". The same docs also state that "Trading is handled off-chain for performance and scalability", with only fund routing and result anchoring on-chain. So there is no number to report in the table above: you cannot check a balance you are never told where to find.
Can I read Carrot Funding's reserve on-chain?+
Yes — and this answer is a correction of ours, published on 10 September 2026. For a few hours this page said no. That was a reading failure on our side, not a gap on Carrot's. Its GitBook publishes a full address table with named roles: Vault Custody Contract, Vault Integrations, a 2-of-4 payout multisig, and the EOA that executes the payouts. Having finally read that page we checked it the same day: the Vault Custody Contract on HyperEVM is a Safe holding about $15,016 in the Felix/Morpho USDC vault, plus $98 on HyperCore. Two limits on how far that reading goes. First, Carrot states its funds are mid-migration from Arbitrum to HyperEVM, so what you can read is one contract on one chain on one day, not everything the firm holds. Second, do not compare it to the $788,521 of "funding capital" on Carrot's Analytics page: the firm told us that figure is an internal risk metric — the capital still free before it stops taking on new funded traders — which is a different quantity from a reserve balance. The payout side is verifiable too: the four payout hashes Carrot publishes are genuine USDC transfers on Arbitrum (733.22 · 384.38 · 399.24 · 799.41), checked one by one. Reading an address table is not a solvency guarantee — no page here is — but publishing which address does what, by name, is more than most of this category offers.
Why do so few decentralized prop firms publish reserves?+
Because a readable reserve is the one claim that cannot be faked and cannot be un-published gracefully. Once the address is public, anyone can watch the balance every day — including the day it goes to zero. Most firms that call themselves on-chain settle payouts on-chain but keep their solvency off-chain. As of 6 October 2026, 2 of the 10 firms we track accept that scrutiny at scale — Hypernova, and since 3 October 2026 Propr — and one other publishes a named custody address you can read, Carrot Funding, whose Safe we read at about $15,016 on 10 September 2026 while its funds migrate from Arbitrum to HyperEVM.